Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board et al. v. Drummond, Attorney General of Oklahoma, Ex Rel. Oklahoma
No. 24-394 · Decided May 22, 2025
The specific legal question is not stated in the provided text. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Oklahoma is affirmed.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA · Argued April 30, 2025
Parties — Petitioner: OKLAHOMA STATEWIDE CHARTER SCHOOL BOARD et al. · Respondent: DRUMMOND, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA, ex rel. OKLAHOMA
Vote & lineupPer Curiam
Who prevailed — The respondent prevailed because the lower court's judgment was affirmed.
The question

The specific legal question is not stated in the provided text. The syllabus section, which typically contains the question, is blank. Therefore, the precise issue before the Court cannot be determined from the provided document.

Petitioner's argument
  • not stated
Respondent's argument
  • not stated
The decision
  • The Court affirmed the judgment of the Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
  • The decision was issued as a Per Curiam opinion.
  • The Court reached this result by being equally divided.
  • Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
  • No specific legal test was applied within the text of the opinion.
  • No authorities, statutes, or constitutional provisions were invoked to support the reasoning.
Read the full opinion on supremecourt.gov (PDF) →